| |

Background
A large, multicenter, randomized phase III study was conducted in
patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer
(MBC) that compared survival rates and time to progression (TTP)
in patients treated with capecitabine/docetaxel to those treated
with standard every-3-week docetaxel monotherapy. At the 2000
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), the data presented
showed
that treatment with capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in superior efficacy
in MBC patients compared to treatment with docetaxel alone.1 The
overall response rate (42% vs. 30%; P = .006), median TTP (6.1
months vs. 4.2 months; P = .0001), and median overall survival
(OS) (13.7 months vs. 11.1 months; P = .0119) were each significantly
higher in patients on the capecitabine/docetaxel
arm compared to the docetaxel-alone arm. With longer follow-up, the
results presented at the 2000 SABCS were confirmed. Overall survival
remained significantly improved in patients receiving capecitabine/docetaxel
at 14.5 months compared with 11.5 months for docetaxel monotherapy
(P < .01).2 The relative
risk of death was reduced by 23% in the capecitabine/docetaxel arm,
and the relative risk of relapse was reduced by 35% (Table
1). - Back to top
Rationale
The survival improvement observed with capecitabine/docetaxel in
patients with metastatic disease has led to the hypothesis that this
regimen could improve the outcome of patients with early-stage breast
cancer. Several trials 3-5 have shown that the sequential
administration of preoperative docetaxel following
an anthracycline-based regimen improves outcome and pathologic complete
response rates in both the lymph nodes and breast. It is hoped that
adding capecitabine to docetaxel will further improve the outcome
of patients
receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. - Back
to top
Eligibility
For enrollment in US Oncology trial 01062, patients are required
to have breast cancer staged T1-3 N1 M0 or T2 N0 M0. Patients with
T1c N0 M0 are eligible if their tumors are estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone
receptor (PR) negative. Patients are also required to be aged < 70
years. The ER/PR status of the
tumor must be known. Patients must also have good kidney and liver
function. Patients with a positive (lesion > 2 mm) sentinel lymph
node biopsy must undergo axillary lymph node dissection. Patients
with evidence of metastatic disease are ineligible. - Back
to top
Treatment
On US Oncology 01062, eligible patients are randomized to postoperative
treatment with standard doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) (60 mg/m2 and
600 mg/m2) for
4 cycles followed by either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks
x 4 cycles or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus capecitabine given on
days 1-14, every 3 weeks x 4 cycles (Figure
1). The dose of capecitabine was initially 950 mg/m2 p.o.
b.i.d. in this trial based on the toxicity data from the phase III trial
in MBC, which showed that a 25% reduction in the initial dose of capecitabine
(from 1250 mg/m2 p.o. b.i.d.) led to a 50% reduction in the
incidence of severe toxicities. Analysis of TTP and OS data from the
phase III MBC trial showed that a 25% reduction in the capecitabine dose
did not lessen the efficacy of the capecitabine/docetaxel combination.
The 01062 protocol was recently amended because > 50% of the patients required a capecitabine dose reduction at some point during cycles 5-8
in the first 60 patients who completed 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The starting dose of capecitabine has been reduced from 1900 mg/m2/day (950 mg/m2 b.i.d.) to
1650 mg/m2/day (825 mg/m2 b.i.d.)
(Table 2).
Clinical research coordinators (CRCs) and physicians should emphasize
to the patients that they are to stop capecitabine and call the CRC for
any grade 2 toxicity. If patients develop capecitabine-related toxicity,
every effort should be made to keep patients on capecitabine with appropriate
dose reduction so as
not to decrease the curative potential of their adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Back to top
Statistics
The primary hypothesis of this trial is that a 25% improvement in disease-free survival with AC—› capecitabine/docetaxel will be observed
compared with AC—› docetaxel alone. This study has a 90% power to detect a significant difference between the 2 study arms.
Two interim safety analyses will be conducted when 150 and 500 patients have completed all 8 cycles of chemotherapy. An interim efficacy analysis will be
conducted at 3 years median follow-up.
Target accrual is 2400 patients (Table 3). - Back
to top
References
1. O’Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, Moiseyenko V, et al. Results of a large phase III trial of Xeloda/Taxotere combination therapy versus Taxotere
monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast
Cancer Res Treat 2000; 64: (abstract 381).
2. O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated
patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J
Clin Oncol 2002; 20:2812-23.
3. Jackisch C, Von Minckwitz G, Raab G, et al. Primary endpoint analysis
of the Geparduo-study—preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) comparing
dose-dense versus sequential Adriamycin/docetaxel combination in
operable breast cancer (T2-3,N0-2, M0). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;
76(suppl 1):S50 (abstract 152).
4. Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J
Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1456-66.
5. NSABP. The effect on primary tumor response of adding sequential Taxotere to Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from NSABP Protocol B-27.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 69:210 (abstract 5).
Back to top
|
|