Background
A large, multicenter, randomized phase III study was conducted in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that compared survival rates and time to progression (TTP) in patients treated with capecitabine/docetaxel to those treated with standard every-3-week docetaxel monotherapy. At the 2000 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), the data presented showed that treatment with capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in superior efficacy in MBC patients compared to treatment with docetaxel alone.1 The overall response rate (42% vs. 30%; P = .006), median TTP (6.1 months vs. 4.2 months; P = .0001), and median overall survival (OS) (13.7 months vs. 11.1 months; P = .0119) were each significantly higher in patients on the capecitabine/docetaxel arm compared to the docetaxel-alone arm. With longer follow-up, the results presented at the 2000 SABCS were confirmed. Overall survival remained significantly improved in patients receiving capecitabine/docetaxel at 14.5 months compared with 11.5 months for docetaxel monotherapy (P < .01).2 The relative risk of death was reduced by 23% in the capecitabine/docetaxel arm, and the relative risk of relapse was reduced by 35% (Table 1). - Back to top



Rationale
The survival improvement observed with capecitabine/docetaxel in patients with metastatic disease has led to the hypothesis that this regimen could improve the outcome of patients with early-stage breast cancer. Several trials 3-5 have shown that the sequential administration of preoperative docetaxel following an anthracycline-based regimen improves outcome and pathologic complete response rates in both the lymph nodes and breast. It is hoped that adding capecitabine to docetaxel will further improve the outcome of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. - Back to top



Eligibility
For enrollment in US Oncology trial 01062, patients are required to have breast cancer staged T1-3 N1 M0 or T2 N0 M0. Patients with T1c N0 M0 are eligible if their tumors are estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) negative. Patients are also required to be aged < 70 years. The ER/PR status of the tumor must be known. Patients must also have good kidney and liver function. Patients with a positive (lesion > 2 mm) sentinel lymph node biopsy must undergo axillary lymph node dissection. Patients with evidence of metastatic disease are ineligible. - Back to top



Treatment
On US Oncology 01062, eligible patients are randomized to postoperative treatment with standard doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) (60 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2) for 4 cycles followed by either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks x 4 cycles or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus capecitabine given on days 1-14, every 3 weeks x 4 cycles (Figure 1). The dose of capecitabine was initially 950 mg/m2 p.o. b.i.d. in this trial based on the toxicity data from the phase III trial in MBC, which showed that a 25% reduction in the initial dose of capecitabine (from 1250 mg/m2 p.o. b.i.d.) led to a 50% reduction in the incidence of severe toxicities. Analysis of TTP and OS data from the phase III MBC trial showed that a 25% reduction in the capecitabine dose did not lessen the efficacy of the capecitabine/docetaxel combination.

The 01062 protocol was recently amended because > 50% of the patients required a capecitabine dose reduction at some point during cycles 5-8 in the first 60 patients who completed 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The starting dose of capecitabine has been reduced from 1900 mg/m2/day (950 mg/m2 b.i.d.) to 1650 mg/m2/day (825 mg/m2 b.i.d.)
(Table 2).

Clinical research coordinators (CRCs) and physicians should emphasize to the patients that they are to stop capecitabine and call the CRC for any grade 2 toxicity. If patients develop capecitabine-related toxicity, every effort should be made to keep patients on capecitabine with appropriate dose reduction so as not to decrease the curative potential of their adjuvant chemotherapy. - Back to top



Statistics
The primary hypothesis of this trial is that a 25% improvement in disease-free survival with AC—› capecitabine/docetaxel will be observed compared with AC—› docetaxel alone. This study has a 90% power to detect a significant difference between the 2 study arms.

Two interim safety analyses will be conducted when 150 and 500 patients have completed all 8 cycles of chemotherapy. An interim efficacy analysis will be conducted at 3 years median follow-up.

Target accrual is 2400 patients (Table 3). - Back to top



References

1. O’Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, Moiseyenko V, et al. Results of a large phase III trial of Xeloda/Taxotere combination therapy versus Taxotere monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000; 64: (abstract 381).

2. O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:2812-23.

3. Jackisch C, Von Minckwitz G, Raab G, et al. Primary endpoint analysis of the Geparduo-study—preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) comparing dose-dense versus sequential Adriamycin/docetaxel combination in operable breast cancer (T2-3,N0-2, M0). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 76(suppl 1):S50 (abstract 152).

4. Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1456-66.

5. NSABP. The effect on primary tumor response of adding sequential Taxotere to Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from NSABP Protocol B-27. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 69:210 (abstract 5).

Back to top